David Earnhardt, an emmy-award winning director has released his second full length documentary, "Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections" Here are a few snips from a thoughtful review appearing in OpEdNews:
Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_judith_c_080131_election_fraud_3a__an_.htm
... Earnhardt adds a new chapter to the election fraud narrative as he covers
the 2006 national off- year elections. His film documents what Jonathan Simon
and Bruce O’Dell of Election Defense Alliance statistically demonstrated in
their November 2006 research paper “Landslide Denied: Exit Polls vs. Vote Count
2006”. The assertion is that 3 million votes “went missing” nationwide,
negatively affecting numerous elections. Most of all, these 3 million voters,
often urban and poor, were disenfranchised, seriously compromising the American
democratic system.
...
The interview of Bruce Funk, rancher and Republican County Clerk for over 23
years in Emery County Utah, is very compelling. Funk discovered flaws in the
new Diebold machines and reported it to authorities. Diebold flew in attorneys
to Utah who
conferred secretly with state officials. They in turn pressured local officials
who relieved Funk of his job. Thus a private corporation trumped a popularly
elected government official!
...
Earnhardt advocates showing his film to raise awareness. That is an
important first step. But his film has two major weaknesses: First, his
traditional remedies, such as contacting legislators, writing letters to the
editor, and volunteering to be a poll worker or poll watcher, to date have been
ineffective in solving American election fraud. The events of elections since
2000 show all branches of government unresponsive to the will of the people.
... second ... Earnhardt deals only with the
problems of the touch screens and advocates paper ballots that can provide a
paper trail, supposedly to be counted by optical scanners. This is a “faux
solution.” All voting machines must go, both touch screens and optical
scanners! Both systems involve the use of secret software, controlled by
private corporations protecting their trade secrets. The secret software is
employed when the optical scanners count the paper ballots. The first count
must be correct and uncorrupted! History proves no second chance.
Recounts are expensive and very difficult to get. None have overturned an
election since debacle 2000. Despite claims of the new and improved Holt Bill
calling for a paper ballot, those optical scanners, employing corruptible
secret software programs controlled by private companies, would still count our
paper ballots. ...
